Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Omni vs Mistral Small 3.2

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

42.9

Rank #91 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3.2 Mistral AI

30.8

Rank #271 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.6 to 45.1.
  • Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.0938 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2-Omni.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
  • Mistral Small 3.2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-Omni and Mistral Small 3.2 specifications
MiMo-V2-OmniMistral Small 3.2
ProviderXiaomiMistral AI
Noometry Index42.930.8
Released2026-03-182025-06-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window262K256K
Max output131K16K
Input $ / M tokens$0.14$0.0938
Output $ / M tokens$0.28$0.25
Results tracked186

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Coding1467—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86), Mistral Small 3.2: 17.5 (#282)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMistral Small 3.2
Kagi LLM Benchmark—40.4%
Chess Puzzles—1%
LMArena Hard Prompts1445—
Epoch Capabilities Index—131.73

Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112), Mistral Small 3.2: 24.9 (#251)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMistral Small 3.2
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—30.3%
LMArena Math1432—

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.8 (#249)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMistral Small 3.2
GPQA Diamond—49.1%
LMArena Expert1449—

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Vision1228—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Non-English1404—
LMArena Chinese1469—
LMArena French1448—
LMArena German1398—
LMArena Japanese1318—
LMArena Korean1355—
LMArena Russian1412—
LMArena Spanish1432—

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Instruction Following1428—

Long Context Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72), Mistral Small 3.2: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Longer Query1442—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.1 (#219)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Text1424—
LMArena Creative Writing1393—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1255
LMArena Multi-Turn1446—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Mistral Small 3.2?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Omni or Mistral Small 3.2?

Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0938 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Omni lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Mistral Small 3.2 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper