Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.4 to 50.2.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Omni | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 39.4 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1347 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1322 |
Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1430 | 1305 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | 1308 |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | 1328 |
| LMArena German | 1399 | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1434 | 1336 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1317 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | 1299 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1312 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1423 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2-Omni or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.