Noometry

Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Omni vs Qwen3 Max

MiMo-V2-Omni and Qwen3 Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.6 vs 43.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

43.6

Rank #88 Confirmed

Qwen3 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

43.7

Rank #87 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3 Max in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 Max leads 48.1 to 40.5.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $6 for Qwen3 Max.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-OmniQwen3 Max
ProviderXiaomiAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.643.7
Released2026-03-182025-09-23
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window262K262K
Max output131K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.14$1.20
Output $ / M tokens$0.28$6
Results tracked1833

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89), Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniQwen3 Max
LMArena Coding14661456
ALE-Bench—370.45

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: —, Qwen3 Max: —

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniQwen3 Max
Vending-Bench 2—71.56

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88), Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniQwen3 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts14451448
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—30.1%
Chess Puzzles—4%
Mystery Game Puzzles—5%
DTBench—82.1%
LMCA—28.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—142.38

Math Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115), Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniQwen3 Max
LMArena Math14301446
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
MATH Level 5—97.1%

Knowledge Qwen3 Max leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118), Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniQwen3 Max
LMArena Expert14491455
GPQA Diamond—72.6%
SimpleQA Verified—48.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63), Qwen3 Max: —

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniQwen3 Max
LMArena Vision1228—

Multilingual Qwen3 Max leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102), Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniQwen3 Max
LMArena Non-English14041429
LMArena Chinese14651478
LMArena French14471449
LMArena German13991463
LMArena Japanese13171397
LMArena Korean13551399
LMArena Russian14121428
LMArena Spanish14341462

Instruction Following Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66), Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniQwen3 Max
LMArena Instruction Following14281419

Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76), Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniQwen3 Max
LMArena Longer Query14421438
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench—14.5%

Writing & Preference Qwen3 Max leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87), Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniQwen3 Max
LMArena Text14231439
LMArena Creative Writing13921402
LMArena Multi-Turn14451446

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Qwen3 Max?

MiMo-V2-Omni and Qwen3 Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.6 vs 43.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Omni or Qwen3 Max?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Max lists at $1.20 and $6.

Is MiMo-V2-Omni or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (43.3 vs 43.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Qwen3 Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper