Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Pro vs Mistral Medium 3.1
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Mistral Medium 3.1 in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 22.1 to 10.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Thematic Generalization: 45.9% for MiMo-V2-Pro and 20.3% for Mistral Medium 3.1.
- MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2 for Mistral Medium 3.1.
- MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Max output | 131K | 105K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | $2 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1433 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1476 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.17 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 25.8% | 6.5% |
| Thematic Generalization | 45.9% | 20.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1457 | — |
Math Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1447 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1478 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | — |
| LMArena French | 1469 | — |
| LMArena German | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1366 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1457 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1445 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138), Mistral Medium 3.1: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | 15.7% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1476 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Mistral Medium 3.1?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro or Mistral Medium 3.1?
MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.1 lists at $0.40 and $2.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.