Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Pro vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 41.4 to 18.3.
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1433 | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1476 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.17 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 25.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 45.9% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1457 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1447 | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1478 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | — |
| LMArena French | 1469 | — |
| LMArena German | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1366 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1400 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1457 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1445 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | 15.7% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.9% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2-Pro or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.