Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Pro vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 42.4 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Pro costs 2.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Step 5 Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi

42.4

Rank #102 Confirmed

Step 5 Preview StepFun

43.8

Rank #78 Reported

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Step 5 Preview in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 5 Preview leads 38.0 to 21.3.
  • MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2.70 for Step 5 Preview.
  • MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1.02M.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-Pro and Step 5 Preview specifications
MiMo-V2-ProStep 5 Preview
ProviderXiaomiStepFun
Noometry Index42.443.8
Released2026-03-182026-09-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M1.02M
Max output131K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$1
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$2.70
Results tracked233

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 5 Preview leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76), Step 5 Preview: 50.6 (#40)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 5 Preview
LMArena WebDev14331569
SciCode—58.9%
LMArena Coding1476—
ALE-Bench785.17—

Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200), Step 5 Preview: 38.0 (#58)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 5 Preview
NYT Connections (extended)25.8%—
CritPt—20.9%
Thematic Generalization45.9%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1457—

Math Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104), Step 5 Preview: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 5 Preview
LMArena Math1447—

Knowledge Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106), Step 5 Preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 5 Preview
LMArena Expert1479—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77), Step 5 Preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English1416—
LMArena Chinese1455—
LMArena French1470—
LMArena German1417—
LMArena Japanese1366—
LMArena Korean1401—
LMArena Russian1427—
LMArena Spanish1458—

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46), Step 5 Preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 5 Preview
LMArena Instruction Following1444—

Long Context Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133), Step 5 Preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 5 Preview
CL-bench15.7%—
CL-bench Life6.9%—
LMArena Longer Query1455—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67), Step 5 Preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text1436—
LMArena Creative Writing1415—
LMArena Multi-Turn1456—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 42.4 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Pro costs 2.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Step 5 Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro or Step 5 Preview?

MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview lists at $1 and $2.70.

Is MiMo-V2-Pro or Step 5 Preview better for coding?

Step 5 Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.6 versus 43.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1.02M.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Step 5 Preview share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper