Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.5 vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M2.5 costs 3.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.2's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2.5 MiniMax

38.3

Rank #188 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher in 1 category and Muse Spark 1.2 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 51.3 to 17.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 16.8% for MiniMax-M2.5 and 79.2% for Muse Spark 1.2.
  • MiniMax-M2.5 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.2.
  • Muse Spark 1.2 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 205K.
  • MiniMax-M2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2.5 and Muse Spark 1.2 specifications
MiniMax-M2.5Muse Spark 1.2
ProviderMiniMaxMeta
Noometry Index38.350.3
Released2026-02-122026-08-05
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window205K1.05M
Max output131K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$1.25
Output $ / M tokens$1.20$4.25
Results tracked3331

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 48.1 (#58), Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena WebDev13871533
LMArena Coding13811495
DeepSWE—54.9%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)75.8%—
SWE-bench Multilingual68.3%—
FrontierSWE—12%
SciCode—56.4%
WeirdML—60.3%
ALE-Bench618.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Too close to call

MiniMax-M2.5: 30.4 (#77), Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Muse Spark 1.2
Terminal-Bench42.7%—
APEX-Agents—36.4%
GDP.pdf—16%
Vending-Bench 2-23.16—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 17.5 (#292), Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Muse Spark 1.2
NYT Connections (extended)16.8%79.2%
LMArena Hard Prompts13721486
Epoch Capabilities Index146.68154.87
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
SimpleBench—74.5%
Kagi LLM Benchmark55.2%—
ARC-AGI-163.7%—
CritPt—17.7%
DTBench—94.7%
LMCA—48.4%

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 26.9 (#253), Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Muse Spark 1.2
ProofBench4%43%
LMArena Math13781471

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 39.2 (#135), Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Expert13791480
SimpleQA Verified—60.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.1%—

Multimodal Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.5: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision—1305

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 47.1 (#152), Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Non-English13381478
LMArena Chinese13931511
LMArena French13621513
LMArena Russian13581487
LMArena Spanish13541498
LMArena German1362—
LMArena Japanese1171—
LMArena Korean1232—

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 71.5 (#148), Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Instruction Following13531461

Long Context Muse Spark 1.2 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 37.5 (#216), Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Longer Query13661475
CL-bench11.4%—
CL-bench Life6.3%—

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 53.9 (#153), Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Muse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text13591482
LMArena Creative Writing13311449
EQ-Bench Creative Writing13611840
LMArena Multi-Turn13641494

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2.5 better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M2.5 costs 3.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.2's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2.5 or Muse Spark 1.2?

MiniMax-M2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.

Is MiniMax-M2.5 or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 48.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.2 does, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.5 and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.5 has 33 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper