Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.5 vs Sonar

MiniMax-M2.5 and Sonar score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.3 vs 38.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2.5 MiniMax

38.3

Rank #188 Confirmed

Sonar Perplexity

38.5

Rank #187 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiniMax-M2.5 leads 48.1 to 35.7.
  • MiniMax-M2.5 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $1 for Sonar.
  • MiniMax-M2.5 accepts more context: 205K tokens versus 128K.
  • MiniMax-M2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2.5 and Sonar specifications
MiniMax-M2.5Sonar
ProviderMiniMaxPerplexity
Noometry Index38.338.5
Released2026-02-122024-01-01
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window205K128K
Max output131K4K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$1
Output $ / M tokens$1.20$1
Results tracked337

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 48.1 (#58), Sonar: 35.7 (#221)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Sonar
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)75.8%—
LMArena WebDev1387—
SWE-bench Multilingual68.3%—
LiveBench Coding—35.1%
LMArena Coding1381—
ALE-Bench618.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.5: 30.4 (#77), Sonar: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Sonar
Terminal-Bench42.7%—
Vending-Bench 2-23.16—

Reasoning Sonar leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 17.5 (#292), Sonar: 21.1 (#227)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Sonar
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark55.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)16.8%—
ARC-AGI-163.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning—46.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1372—
LiveBench Data Analysis—37.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index146.68—
LiveBench—46.9%

Math Sonar leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 26.9 (#253), Sonar: 33.7 (#200)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Sonar
ProofBench4%—
LiveBench Math—41.6%
LMArena Math1378—

Knowledge Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.5: 39.2 (#135), Sonar: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Sonar
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.1%—
LMArena Expert1379—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.5: 47.1 (#152), Sonar: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Sonar
LMArena Non-English1338—
LMArena Chinese1393—
LMArena French1362—
LMArena German1362—
LMArena Japanese1171—
LMArena Korean1232—
LMArena Russian1358—
LMArena Spanish1354—

Instruction Following Too close to call

MiniMax-M2.5: 71.5 (#148), Sonar: 71.4 (#150)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Sonar
LiveBench Instruction Following—76.2%
LMArena Instruction Following1353—

Long Context Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.5: 37.5 (#216), Sonar: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Sonar
CL-bench11.4%—
CL-bench Life6.3%—
LMArena Longer Query1366—

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 53.9 (#153), Sonar: 52.6 (#167)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Sonar
LMArena Text1359—
LMArena Creative Writing1331—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1361—
LMArena Multi-Turn1364—
LiveBench Language—44.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2.5 better than Sonar?

MiniMax-M2.5 and Sonar score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.3 vs 38.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M2.5 or Sonar?

MiniMax-M2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Sonar lists at $1 and $1.

Is MiniMax-M2.5 or Sonar better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.1 versus 35.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax-M2.5 does, with 205K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.5 and Sonar share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.5 has 33 scored results on Noometry and Sonar has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper