Model comparison
MiniMax-M3 vs Muse Spark 1.3
Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M3 costs 3.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 31 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 31 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M3 scores higher in 1 category and Muse Spark 1.3 in 9 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 73.1 to 40.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 18% for MiniMax-M3 and 58% for Muse Spark 1.3.
- MiniMax-M3 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.3.
- Muse Spark 1.3 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
- MiniMax-M3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiniMax-M3 | Muse Spark 1.3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 54.8 |
| Released | 2026-06-01 | 2026-09-02 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 1.05M |
| Max output | 512K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | $4.25 |
| Results tracked | 41 | 37 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads
MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118), Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1482 | 1657 |
| SciCode | 47.1% | 59.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | 1514 |
| FrontierCode | 14.7% | — |
| CursorBench | — | 41.6% |
| ALE-Bench | 640.02 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Muse Spark 1.3 leads
MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130), Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.7% | 57.8% |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 4.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| GDP.pdf | — | 27.6% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 2,158 | — |
Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads
MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87), Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.1% | 85.1% |
| CritPt | 3.7% | 26% |
| Chess Puzzles | 14% | 38% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | 1503 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 8% | 25% |
| DTBench | 78.9% | 96.5% |
| LMCA | 33.7% | 53.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.95 | 156.75 |
| SimpleBench | 45.8% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 55% | — |
| Bench to the Future 3 | — | 0.14 |
| ForecastBench | 61.4 | — |
Math Muse Spark 1.3 leads
MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95), Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | 99.2% |
| ProofBench | 18% | 58% |
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1494 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46.3% |
Knowledge MiniMax-M3 leads
MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35), Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1461 | 1516 |
| GPQA Diamond | 90.9% | — |
Multimodal Muse Spark 1.3 leads
MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51), Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1253 | 1309 |
| LMArena Document | 1435 | 1471 |
Multilingual Muse Spark 1.3 leads
MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75), Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 1481 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1463 | 1529 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | 1524 |
| LMArena German | 1426 | 1515 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1381 | 1474 |
| LMArena Korean | 1372 | 1501 |
| LMArena Russian | 1428 | 1490 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1432 | 1490 |
Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.3 leads
MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62), Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1433 | 1477 |
Long Context Muse Spark 1.3 leads
MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72), Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1445 | 1488 |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.3 leads
MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83), Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Muse Spark 1.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1433 | 1490 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1404 | 1455 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | 1482 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1906 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1150 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax-M3 better than Muse Spark 1.3?
Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index. MiniMax-M3 costs 3.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M3 or Muse Spark 1.3?
MiniMax-M3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.3 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.
Is MiniMax-M3 or Muse Spark 1.3 better for coding?
Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.6 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Muse Spark 1.3 does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M3 and Muse Spark 1.3 share?
31 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M3 has 41 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.3 has 37.