Model comparison
Mistral Large 4 vs phi-3-medium 14B
Mistral Large 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Mistral Large 4 leads 36.6 to 9.1.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mistral Large 4 | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2026-10-06 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 262K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.68 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.09 | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mistral Large 4 leads
Mistral Large 4: 48.6 (#57), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1541 | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1475 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Mistral Large 4: 22.5 (#192), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 27.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1444 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.23 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math Mistral Large 4 leads
Mistral Large 4: 40.4 (#91), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1488 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge Mistral Large 4 leads
Mistral Large 4: 36.6 (#166), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | 20% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Large 4: 52.6 (#82), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1415 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1491 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1414 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Large 4: 75.0 (#76), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1424 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Large 4: 43.6 (#89), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1429 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Mistral Large 4: 60.4 (#97), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Large 4 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1361 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1424 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Large 4 better than phi-3-medium 14B?
Mistral Large 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Mistral Large 4 or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
Mistral Large 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 36.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Large 4 and phi-3-medium 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Large 4 has 15 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.