Model comparison

Mistral Large 4 vs Qwen Plus

Mistral Large 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Plus costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Large 4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Large 4 Mistral AI

43.1

Rank #99 Confirmed

Qwen Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

37.1

Rank #210 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Large 4 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen Plus in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Mistral Large 4 leads 40.4 to 23.3.
  • Qwen Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.68 / $2.09 for Mistral Large 4.
  • Mistral Large 4 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.

Side by side

Mistral Large 4 and Qwen Plus specifications
Mistral Large 4Qwen Plus
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.137.1
Released2026-10-062024-01-25
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M1M
Max output262K33K
Input $ / M tokens$0.68$0.40
Output $ / M tokens$2.09$1.20
Results tracked1520

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Large 4 leads

Mistral Large 4: 48.6 (#57), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 4Qwen Plus
LMArena Coding14751328
LMArena WebDev1541—

Reasoning Qwen Plus leads

Mistral Large 4: 22.5 (#192), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 4Qwen Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts14441317
Kagi LLM Benchmark—63.3%
NYT Connections (extended)27.4%—
DTBench—81.1%
LMCA—24%

Math Mistral Large 4 leads

Mistral Large 4: 40.4 (#91), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 4Qwen Plus
LMArena Math14881326
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—17.8%
MATH Level 5—65.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge Mistral Large 4 leads

Mistral Large 4: 36.6 (#166), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 4Qwen Plus
LMArena Expert14471328
GPQA Diamond—48.1%
SimpleQA Verified20%—

Multilingual Mistral Large 4 leads

Mistral Large 4: 52.6 (#82), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 4Qwen Plus
LMArena Non-English14151310
LMArena Chinese14911347
LMArena Russian14141323
LMArena Japanese—1251

Instruction Following Mistral Large 4 leads

Mistral Large 4: 75.0 (#76), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 4Qwen Plus
LMArena Instruction Following14241303

Long Context Mistral Large 4 leads

Mistral Large 4: 43.6 (#89), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 4Qwen Plus
LMArena Longer Query14291324

Writing & Preference Mistral Large 4 leads

Mistral Large 4: 60.4 (#97), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Large 4Qwen Plus
LMArena Text14271326
LMArena Creative Writing13611293
LMArena Multi-Turn14241336

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Large 4 better than Qwen Plus?

Mistral Large 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index. Qwen Plus costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Large 4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Large 4 or Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 4 lists at $0.68 and $2.09.

Is Mistral Large 4 or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Mistral Large 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Large 4 does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Large 4 and Qwen Plus share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Large 4 has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper