Model comparison
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Nova 2 Lite
Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Nova 2 Lite leads 26.4 to 10.1.
- Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper at $0.40 / $2 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Nova 2 Lite.
- Nova 2 Lite accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| Mistral Medium 3.1 | Nova 2 Lite | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 31.5 | 39.0 |
| Released | — | 2025-12-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | 1M |
| Max output | 105K | 64K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | $2.50 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Nova 2 Lite: 40.1 (#131)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1386 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Nova 2 Lite: 23.9 (#114)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.1% |
Reasoning Nova 2 Lite leads
Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.1 (#336), Nova 2 Lite: 26.4 (#120)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 6.5% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 20.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1364 |
Math Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Nova 2 Lite: 34.8 (#154)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1359 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Nova 2 Lite: 42.5 (#88)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1360 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Nova 2 Lite: 47.3 (#148)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1364 |
| LMArena French | — | 1381 |
| LMArena German | — | 1343 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1273 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1284 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1343 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1372 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Nova 2 Lite: 70.7 (#156)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1335 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#145)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1335 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads
Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.6 (#140), Nova 2 Lite: 54.1 (#150)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Nova 2 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1362 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1291 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1476 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1338 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Nova 2 Lite?
Nova 2 Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Nova 2 Lite?
Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2 per million output tokens; Nova 2 Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nova 2 Lite does, with 1M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.1 and Nova 2 Lite share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2 Lite has 19.