Model comparison
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 25.4 to 10.1.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.5 | 38.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 105K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1346 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.1 (#336), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 6.5% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 20.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1322 |
Math Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1307 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1337 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1298 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads
Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.6 (#140), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1264 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1476 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.1 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.