Model comparison
Mistral Medium vs Qwen Plus
Mistral Medium and Qwen Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.3 vs 37.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Medium scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen Plus in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium leads 60.0 to 52.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 81.6% for Mistral Medium and 65.3% for Qwen Plus.
- Qwen Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Mistral Medium.
- Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Mistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mistral Medium | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.3 | 37.1 |
| Released | 2023-12-11 | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 262K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.50 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $7.50 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 36 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen Plus leads
Mistral Medium: 34.2 (#243), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1434 | 1328 |
| FrontierCode | 8% | — |
| SciCode | 40.2% | — |
| WeirdML | 43.7% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 763.98 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Medium: 28.3 (#90), Qwen Plus: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 37.7% | — |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Mistral Medium: 24.0 (#167), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 50% | 63.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1426 | 1317 |
| DTBench | 75.5% | 81.1% |
| LMCA | 26.1% | 24% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 26.9% | — |
Math Mistral Medium leads
Mistral Medium: 28.1 (#245), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 32.2% | 17.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1408 | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | 81.6% | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.3% | 1.7% |
| ProofBench | 9% | — |
Knowledge Qwen Plus leads
Mistral Medium: 25.0 (#265), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 59.5% | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1408 | 1328 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 22.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Mistral Medium: 35.3 (#88), Qwen Plus: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1172 | — |
Multilingual Mistral Medium leads
Mistral Medium: 52.1 (#91), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1408 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1447 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1378 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1411 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1459 | — |
| LMArena German | 1432 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1380 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1433 | — |
Instruction Following Mistral Medium leads
Mistral Medium: 73.7 (#116), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1398 | 1303 |
Long Context Mistral Medium leads
Mistral Medium: 42.9 (#114), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1406 | 1324 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium leads
Mistral Medium: 60.0 (#103), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1424 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1418 | 1336 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 77.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Medium better than Qwen Plus?
Mistral Medium and Qwen Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (36.3 vs 37.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium or Qwen Plus?
Qwen Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium lists at $1.50 and $7.50.
Is Mistral Medium or Qwen Plus better for coding?
Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium and Qwen Plus share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium has 36 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.