Model comparison
Mistral Nemo vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat
Qwen1.5 4b Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.3 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads 26.2 to 12.3.
Side by side
| Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.9 | 28.3 |
| Released | 2024-07-01 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 28.6 (#305)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 999 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: 23.3 (#118), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.6% | — |
| BALROG | 17.6% | — |
Reasoning Mistral Nemo leads
Mistral Nemo: 19.9 (#230), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 17.7 (#277)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 976 |
| DTBench | 48.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 118.63 | — |
| PIQA | 83.5% | — |
Math Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads
Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#263), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 27.9 (#233)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1026 |
| MATH Level 5 | 10.8% | — |
| GSM8K | 84.2% | — |
Knowledge Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads
Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#293), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.2 (#252)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 980 |
| BoolQ | 82.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 979 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1024 |
| LMArena German | — | 902 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 952 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.3 (#295)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 979 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Nemo: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#285)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 988 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Nemo leads
Mistral Nemo: 28.6 (#291), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.9 (#304)
| Benchmark | Mistral Nemo | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 997 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 969 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 881 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 977 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Nemo better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?
Qwen1.5 4b Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.3 to 25.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Nemo and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Nemo has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.