Model comparison

Mistral Small 3.1 vs Olmo 7b Instruct

Mistral Small 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.7 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small 3.1 Mistral AI

31.7

Rank #269 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher in 5 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 1 category; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Mistral Small 3.1 leads 41.2 to 24.0.

Side by side

Mistral Small 3.1 and Olmo 7b Instruct specifications
Mistral Small 3.1Olmo 7b Instruct
ProviderMistral AIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index31.730.3
Released2025-03-17—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window128K—
Max output102K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.35—
Output $ / M tokens$0.56—
Results tracked2810

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 38.3 (#179), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Coding13091016

Reasoning Too close to call

Mistral Small 3.1: 19.7 (#254), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts1278993
Chess Puzzles1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index127.48—

Math Olmo 7b Instruct leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 14.7 (#301), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Math12621018
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20253.9%—
Omni-MATH24.8%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#271), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Olmo 7b Instruct
GPQA Diamond41.9%—
MMLU-Pro61%—
GPQA (HELM)39.2%—
LMArena Expert1257—

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.1: 33.2 (#99), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Vision1136—

Multilingual Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 41.2 (#209), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Non-English1255977
LMArena Chinese12531014
LMArena Russian1263947
LMArena French1273—
LMArena German1266—
LMArena Japanese1208—
LMArena Korean1206—
LMArena Spanish1283—

Instruction Following Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 63.6 (#230), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1264978
IFEval75%—

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#178), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1299—

Writing & Preference Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Mistral Small 3.1: 37.0 (#259), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.1Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Text12771032
LMArena Creative Writing1253990
LMArena Multi-Turn12701007
EQ-Bench Creative Writing761—
WildBench78.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small 3.1 better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

Mistral Small 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.7 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral Small 3.1 or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.1 and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.1 has 28 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper