Model comparison
Mistral Small 3.1 vs Wizardlm 70b
Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher in 5 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Wizardlm 70b leads 29.7 to 13.7.
Side by side
| Mistral Small 3.1 | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 32.4 |
| Released | 2025-03-17 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 102K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.35 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.56 | — |
| Results tracked | 28 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Mistral Small 3.1 leads
Mistral Small 3.1: 37.7 (#175), Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1309 | 1081 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Mistral Small 3.1: 18.9 (#249), Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1278 | 1079 |
| Chess Puzzles | 1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 127.48 | — |
Math Wizardlm 70b leads
Mistral Small 3.1: 13.7 (#295), Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1261 | 1116 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 3.9% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 24.8% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#266), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 41.9% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 61% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1258 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Mistral Small 3.1: 32.6 (#93), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1136 | — |
Multilingual Mistral Small 3.1 leads
Mistral Small 3.1: 41.4 (#204), Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1255 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1254 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1266 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1263 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1270 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1210 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1283 | — |
Instruction Following Mistral Small 3.1 leads
Mistral Small 3.1: 63.8 (#225), Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1264 | 1093 |
| IFEval | 75% | — |
Long Context Mistral Small 3.1 leads
Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#172), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1300 | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Small 3.1 leads
Mistral Small 3.1: 37.2 (#254), Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)
| Benchmark | Mistral Small 3.1 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1278 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1253 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1270 | 1108 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 761 | — |
| WildBench | 78.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Small 3.1 better than Wizardlm 70b?
Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Mistral Small 3.1 or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Mistral Small 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.1 and Wizardlm 70b share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.1 has 28 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.