Model comparison

Mistral Small vs Qwen-14B

Mistral Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small Mistral AI

33.4

Rank #243 Confirmed

Qwen-14B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.4

Rank #275 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen-14B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Small leads 52.5 to 27.6.

Side by side

Mistral Small and Qwen-14B specifications
Mistral SmallQwen-14B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.431.4
Released2024-02-262023-09-24
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output256K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked3918

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Small leads

Mistral Small: 34.0 (#247), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen-14B
LMArena Coding13621071
SciCode26.5%—
BigCodeBench Instruct36.1%—
LiveBench Coding36.2%—
BigCodeBench Complete46.6%—
ALE-Bench497.62—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral Small: 28.1 (#93), Qwen-14B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen-14B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard37.1%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Mistral Small: 19.8 (#250), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen-14B
LMArena Hard Prompts13351027
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.8%—
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning44.8%—
DTBench70.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis53.7%—
LMCA20.6%—
BIG-Bench Hard—55%
Epoch Capabilities Index—113.03
LAMBADA—71.1%
LiveBench44%—
PIQA—79.9%

Math Qwen-14B leads

Mistral Small: 16.4 (#293), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen-14B
LMArena Math13411068
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20255.8%—
LiveBench Math39.9%—
MATH Level 546.8%—
GSM8K—61.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

Mistral Small: 31.0 (#222), Qwen-14B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen-14B
MMLU68.7%66.3%
GPQA Diamond47.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.1%—
LMArena Expert1291—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.4%
BoolQ—86.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Small: 33.5 (#96), Qwen-14B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen-14B
LMArena Vision1142—

Multilingual Mistral Small leads

Mistral Small: 45.5 (#169), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen-14B
LMArena Non-English13151041
LMArena Chinese13401077
LMArena French1337—
LMArena German1340—
LMArena Japanese1275—
LMArena Korean1259—
LMArena Russian1324—
LMArena Spanish1346—

Instruction Following Mistral Small leads

Mistral Small: 66.4 (#209), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen-14B
LMArena Instruction Following13101031
LiveBench Instruction Following63.7%—

Long Context Mistral Small leads

Mistral Small: 40.4 (#156), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen-14B
LMArena Longer Query13271028

Writing & Preference Mistral Small leads

Mistral Small: 52.5 (#171), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen-14B
LMArena Text13381051
LMArena Creative Writing13051028
LMArena Multi-Turn13441022
LiveBench Language30.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small better than Qwen-14B?

Mistral Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mistral Small or Qwen-14B better for coding?

Mistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.0 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small and Qwen-14B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small has 39 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper