Noometry

Model comparison

Mistral Small vs Qwen1.5-110B

Mistral Small and Qwen1.5-110B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.1 vs 33.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small Mistral AI

33.1

Rank #238 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-110B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.6

Rank #231 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral Small scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 31.1 to 15.4.

Side by side

Mistral SmallQwen1.5-110B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.133.6
Released2024-02-262024-04-25
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window256K—
Max output256K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked3920

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mistral Small leads

Mistral Small: 33.5 (#242), Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260)

BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen1.5-110B
BigCodeBench Instruct36.1%35%
LMArena Coding13631184
BigCodeBench Complete46.6%44.4%
SciCode26.5%—
LiveBench Coding36.2%—
ALE-Bench497.62—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mistral Small: 27.9 (#87), Qwen1.5-110B: —

BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen1.5-110B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard37.1%—

Reasoning Qwen1.5-110B leads

Mistral Small: 19.3 (#238), Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192)

BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Hard Prompts13361168
Kagi LLM Benchmark37.8%—
CritPt0%—
LiveBench Reasoning44.8%—
DTBench70.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis53.7%—
LMCA20.6%—
ForecastBench—57.7
LiveBench44%—

Math Qwen1.5-110B leads

Mistral Small: 15.4 (#287), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199)

BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Math13411185
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20255.8%—
LiveBench Math39.9%—
MATH Level 546.8%—

Knowledge Too close to call

Mistral Small: 30.9 (#214), Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217)

BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Expert12931144
GPQA Diamond47.5%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.1%—
MMLU68.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Small: 32.9 (#91), Qwen1.5-110B: —

BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Vision1142—

Multilingual Mistral Small leads

Mistral Small: 45.7 (#164), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245)

BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Non-English13151142
LMArena Chinese13421206
LMArena French13371150
LMArena German13411123
LMArena Japanese12751074
LMArena Korean12601044
LMArena Russian13241118
LMArena Spanish13461141

Instruction Following Mistral Small leads

Mistral Small: 66.6 (#204), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247)

BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Instruction Following13101158
LiveBench Instruction Following63.7%—

Long Context Mistral Small leads

Mistral Small: 40.4 (#151), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237)

BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Longer Query13271157

Writing & Preference Mistral Small leads

Mistral Small: 52.6 (#165), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250)

BenchmarkMistral SmallQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Text13381175
LMArena Creative Writing13041148
LMArena Multi-Turn13441160
LiveBench Language30.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Mistral Small and Qwen1.5-110B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.1 vs 33.6), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Mistral Small or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Mistral Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.5 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small and Qwen1.5-110B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small has 39 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper