Model comparison
Mistral vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Mistral scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 61.8 to 52.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is IFEval: 56.8% for Mistral and 78% for Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mistral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 32.2 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 22 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Mistral: 33.2 (#249), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Mistral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1162 | 1210 |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Mistral: 21.3 (#199), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)
| Benchmark | Mistral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1149 | 1208 |
Math Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Mistral: 20.5 (#275), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)
| Benchmark | Mistral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 7.2% | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1180 | 1208 |
Knowledge Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Mistral: 16.3 (#283), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Mistral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 27.7% | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 30.3% | 28.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1125 | — |
Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Mistral: 33.0 (#249), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)
| Benchmark | Mistral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1129 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1109 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1168 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1179 | — |
| LMArena German | 1155 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1012 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1032 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1143 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Mistral: 52.9 (#283), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)
| Benchmark | Mistral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 56.8% | 78% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1152 | 1186 |
Long Context Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Mistral: 35.0 (#240), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)
| Benchmark | Mistral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1154 | 1194 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Mistral: 37.2 (#255), Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)
| Benchmark | Mistral | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1165 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1158 | 1199 |
| WildBench | 66% | 73.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1147 | 1221 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Mistral or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 33.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Mistral and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral has 22 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.