Model comparison

Mixtral 8x22B vs Yi-1.5-34B

Yi-1.5-34B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 26.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Mixtral 8x22B Mistral AI

26.7

Rank #330 Confirmed

Yi-1.5-34B 01.AI

30.2

Rank #286 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Mixtral 8x22B scores higher in 3 categories and Yi-1.5-34B in 5 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Yi-1.5-34B leads 31.9 to 23.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Instruct: 40.6% for Mixtral 8x22B and 33.9% for Yi-1.5-34B.

Side by side

Mixtral 8x22B and Yi-1.5-34B specifications
Mixtral 8x22BYi-1.5-34B
ProviderMistral AI01.AI
Noometry Index26.730.2
Released2024-04-172024-05-13
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window64K—
Max output64K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked3421

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Yi-1.5-34B leads

Mixtral 8x22B: 23.8 (#324), Yi-1.5-34B: 31.9 (#267)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BYi-1.5-34B
BigCodeBench Instruct40.6%33.9%
LMArena Coding11661169
BigCodeBench Complete50.2%43.8%
WeirdML3.2%—
HumanEval+72%—
MBPP+64.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Mixtral 8x22B: 22.8 (#119), Yi-1.5-34B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BYi-1.5-34B
Cybench7.5%—

Reasoning Yi-1.5-34B leads

Mixtral 8x22B: 19.1 (#246), Yi-1.5-34B: 21.5 (#195)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts11501160
DTBench55.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index122—
ForecastBench56.3—

Math Yi-1.5-34B leads

Mixtral 8x22B: 21.2 (#271), Yi-1.5-34B: 25.3 (#248)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Math11841182
MATH Level 524.2%25.5%
Omni-MATH16.3%—

Knowledge Too close to call

Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#288), Yi-1.5-34B: 14.8 (#290)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BYi-1.5-34B
GPQA Diamond34.1%32%
LMArena Expert11131144
MMLU-Pro46%—
GPQA (HELM)33.4%—
MMLU77.8%—

Multilingual Too close to call

Mixtral 8x22B: 32.9 (#250), Yi-1.5-34B: 32.5 (#251)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Non-English11281121
LMArena Chinese11161213
LMArena French11651155
LMArena German11411111
LMArena Japanese10371021
LMArena Korean10561005
LMArena Russian11581091
LMArena Spanish11501120

Instruction Following Yi-1.5-34B leads

Mixtral 8x22B: 57.9 (#261), Yi-1.5-34B: 59.4 (#252)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Instruction Following11471139
IFEval72.4%—

Long Context Too close to call

Mixtral 8x22B: 34.6 (#242), Yi-1.5-34B: 34.6 (#243)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Longer Query11441144

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Mixtral 8x22B: 37.1 (#257), Yi-1.5-34B: 37.6 (#252)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMixtral 8x22BYi-1.5-34B
LMArena Text11621173
LMArena Creative Writing11411135
LMArena Multi-Turn11301153
WildBench71.1%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Mixtral 8x22B better than Yi-1.5-34B?

Yi-1.5-34B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.2 to 26.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Mixtral 8x22B or Yi-1.5-34B better for coding?

Yi-1.5-34B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.9 versus 23.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Mixtral 8x22B and Yi-1.5-34B share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mixtral 8x22B has 34 scored results on Noometry and Yi-1.5-34B has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper