Model comparison

Muse Glimmer vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 32.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Muse Glimmer Meta

41.3

Rank #128 Confirmed

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview Amazon

32.8

Rank #241 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Glimmer leads 27.2 to 21.7.
  • Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Glimmer and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview specifications
Muse GlimmerNova 2.0 Pro Preview
ProviderMetaAmazon
Noometry Index41.332.8
Released—2025-12-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked133

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads

Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.2 (#130)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena WebDev1355—
SciCode—42.7%
LMArena Coding1417—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Glimmer: —, Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#127)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNova 2.0 Pro Preview
GDP.pdf—2%

Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads

Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.7 (#189)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNova 2.0 Pro Preview
CritPt—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1395—

Math Not comparable

Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Math1419—

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Expert1388—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Non-English1384—
LMArena Chinese1412—
LMArena Russian1393—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Instruction Following1374—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Longer Query1381—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse GlimmerNova 2.0 Pro Preview
LMArena Text1389—
LMArena Creative Writing1338—
LMArena Multi-Turn1398—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Glimmer better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 32.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Glimmer or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Glimmer and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Glimmer has 13 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper