Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.2 vs QwQ Plus

Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#48); QwQ Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

QwQ Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

38.0

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 54.1 to 36.4.
  • QwQ Plus is cheaper at $0.80 / $2.40 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.2.
  • Muse Spark 1.2 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.2 and QwQ Plus specifications
Muse Spark 1.2QwQ Plus
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index50.338.0
Released2026-08-052025-03-05
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M131K
Max output131K8K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$0.80
Output $ / M tokens$4.25$2.40
Results tracked311

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51), QwQ Plus: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2QwQ Plus
DeepSWE54.9%—
LMArena WebDev1533—
FrontierSWE12%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML60.3%—
LMArena Coding1495—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87), QwQ Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2QwQ Plus
APEX-Agents36.4%—
GDP.pdf16%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34), QwQ Plus: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2QwQ Plus
SimpleBench74.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)79.2%—
CritPt17.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1486—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA48.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.87—

Math Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70), QwQ Plus: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2QwQ Plus
ProofBench43%—
LMArena Math1471—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53), QwQ Plus: 36.4

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2QwQ Plus
GPQA Diamond—65.4%
SimpleQA Verified60.3%—
LMArena Expert1480—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25), QwQ Plus: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2QwQ Plus
LMArena Vision1305—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11), QwQ Plus: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2QwQ Plus
LMArena Non-English1478—
LMArena Chinese1511—
LMArena French1513—
LMArena Russian1487—
LMArena Spanish1498—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36), QwQ Plus: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2QwQ Plus
LMArena Instruction Following1461—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48), QwQ Plus: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2QwQ Plus
LMArena Longer Query1475—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14), QwQ Plus: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2QwQ Plus
LMArena Text1482—
LMArena Creative Writing1449—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1840—
LMArena Multi-Turn1494—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than QwQ Plus?

Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#48); QwQ Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.2 or QwQ Plus?

QwQ Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.80 per million input tokens and $2.40 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.2 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.2 does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and QwQ Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 31 scored results on Noometry and QwQ Plus has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper