Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.2 vs StarCoder 2 15B

Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#48); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

StarCoder 2 15B NVIDIA

38.1

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher in 1 category and StarCoder 2 15B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 49.2 to 36.6.
  • StarCoder 2 15B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.2 and StarCoder 2 15B specifications
Muse Spark 1.2StarCoder 2 15B
ProviderMetaNVIDIA
Noometry Index50.338.1
Released2026-08-052024-02-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked317

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51), StarCoder 2 15B: 36.6

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2StarCoder 2 15B
DeepSWE54.9%—
LMArena WebDev1533—
FrontierSWE12%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML60.3%—
LMArena Coding1495—
BigCodeBench Complete—38.4%
HumanEval+—37.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2StarCoder 2 15B
APEX-Agents36.4%—
GDP.pdf16%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2StarCoder 2 15B
Epoch Capabilities Index154.87105
SimpleBench74.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)79.2%—
CritPt17.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1486—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA48.4%—
WinoGrande—64.3%

Math Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2StarCoder 2 15B
ProofBench43%—
LMArena Math1471—
GSM8K—57.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2StarCoder 2 15B
SimpleQA Verified60.3%—
LMArena Expert1480—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—47.2%
MMLU—64.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2StarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Vision1305—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2StarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Non-English1478—
LMArena Chinese1511—
LMArena French1513—
LMArena Russian1487—
LMArena Spanish1498—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2StarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Instruction Following1461—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2StarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Longer Query1475—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14), StarCoder 2 15B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2StarCoder 2 15B
LMArena Text1482—
LMArena Creative Writing1449—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1840—
LMArena Multi-Turn1494—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than StarCoder 2 15B?

Muse Spark 1.2 has enough public results to be ranked (#48); StarCoder 2 15B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Muse Spark 1.2 or StarCoder 2 15B better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and StarCoder 2 15B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 31 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 15B has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper