Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.2 vs Yi-34B

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

49.8

Rank #44 Confirmed

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.4

Rank #325 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 53.9 to 7.5.
  • Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.2 and Yi-34B specifications
Muse Spark 1.2Yi-34B
ProviderMeta01.AI
Noometry Index49.827.4
Released2026-08-052023-11-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked2823

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 48.6 (#49), Yi-34B: 31.8 (#269)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Yi-34B
LMArena Coding14971112
DeepSWE54.9%—
LMArena WebDev1532—
FrontierSWE12%—
SciCode56.4%—
WeirdML60.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 29.5 (#77), Yi-34B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Yi-34B
APEX-Agents36.4%—
GDP.pdf16%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 50.4 (#32), Yi-34B: 20.3 (#222)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Yi-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts14901104
Epoch Capabilities Index155.18117.28
SimpleBench74.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)79.2%—
CritPt17.7%—
DTBench94.7%—
LMCA48.4%—
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 43.8 (#68), Yi-34B: 19.8 (#277)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Yi-34B
ProofBench43%—
LMArena Math—1114
MATH Level 5—5.1%
GSM8K—76%

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 53.9 (#49), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#304)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Yi-34B
LMArena Expert14851061
GPQA Diamond—14.7%
SimpleQA Verified60.3%—
MMLU—76.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.2: 42.6 (#24), Yi-34B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Yi-34B
LMArena Vision1304—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 57.4 (#10), Yi-34B: 29.9 (#259)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Yi-34B
LMArena Non-English14791079
LMArena Chinese15191175
LMArena Russian14941050
LMArena French—1080
LMArena German—1042
LMArena Japanese—993
LMArena Korean—959
LMArena Spanish—1070

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 77.1 (#30), Yi-34B: 56.4 (#269)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Yi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following14661091

Long Context Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 45.4 (#35), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#259)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Yi-34B
LMArena Longer Query14831094

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Muse Spark 1.2: 72.6 (#14), Yi-34B: 34.3 (#268)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Yi-34B
LMArena Text14861129
LMArena Creative Writing14441108
LMArena Multi-Turn15041113
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1840—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.2 better than Yi-34B?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.2 or Yi-34B better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.2 and Yi-34B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.2 has 28 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper