Noometry

Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

Olmo 3.1 32b Think Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)

37.9

Rank #191 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 73.1 to 36.3.
  • Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.3Olmo 3.1 32b Think
ProviderMetaAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index54.837.9
Released2026-09-02—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3715

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Coding15141291
CursorBench41.6%—
LMArena WebDev1657—
SciCode59.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3.1 32b Think
APEX-Agents57.8%—
GDP.pdf27.6%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Hard Prompts15031272
NYT Connections (extended)85.1%—
CritPt26%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
Mystery Game Puzzles25%—
DTBench96.5%—
LMCA53.9%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.75—

Math Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Math14941305
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)74.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
ProofBench58%—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Expert15161295

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Vision1309—
LMArena Document1471—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Non-English14811209
LMArena Chinese15291242
LMArena French15241260
LMArena German15151262
LMArena Russian14901193
LMArena Spanish14901289
LMArena Japanese1474—
LMArena Korean1501—

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Instruction Following14771247

Long Context Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Longer Query14881272

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Olmo 3.1 32b Think
LMArena Text14901272
LMArena Creative Writing14551226
LMArena Multi-Turn14821252
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1906—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.3 or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.6 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.3 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.3 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper