Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Palm 2

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

Palm 2 Google

30.0

Rank #298 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher in 7 categories and Palm 2 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 73.6 to 25.6.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.3 and Palm 2 specifications
Muse Spark 1.3Palm 2
ProviderMetaGoogle
Noometry Index54.830.0
Released2026-09-02—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3710

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21), Palm 2: 29.0 (#311)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Palm 2
LMArena Coding1514994
CursorBench41.6%—
LMArena WebDev1657—
SciCode59.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30), Palm 2: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Palm 2
APEX-Agents57.8%—
GDP.pdf27.6%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27), Palm 2: 19.1 (#271)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Palm 2
LMArena Hard Prompts15031005
NYT Connections (extended)85.1%—
CritPt26%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
Mystery Game Puzzles25%—
DTBench96.5%—
LMCA53.9%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.75—

Math Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21), Palm 2: 30.8 (#231)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Palm 2
LMArena Math14941049
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)74.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
ProofBench58%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95), Palm 2: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Palm 2
LMArena Expert1516—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22), Palm 2: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Palm 2
LMArena Vision1309—
LMArena Document1471—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8), Palm 2: 20.9 (#295)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Palm 2
LMArena Non-English1481916
LMArena Chinese1529887
LMArena French1524—
LMArena German1515—
LMArena Japanese1474—
LMArena Korean1501—
LMArena Russian1490—
LMArena Spanish1490—

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22), Palm 2: 51.0 (#296)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Palm 2
LMArena Instruction Following14771010

Long Context Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32), Palm 2: 30.8 (#285)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Palm 2
LMArena Longer Query14881010

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9), Palm 2: 25.6 (#304)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Palm 2
LMArena Text14901027
LMArena Creative Writing1455991
LMArena Multi-Turn1482994
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1906—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than Palm 2?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.3 or Palm 2 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.6 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.3 and Palm 2 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.3 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper