Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs phi-3-medium 14B

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

phi-3-medium 14B Microsoft

29.7

Rank #306 Reported

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher in 3 categories and phi-3-medium 14B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 73.1 to 27.3.
  • phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.3 and phi-3-medium 14B specifications
Muse Spark 1.3phi-3-medium 14B
ProviderMetaMicrosoft
Noometry Index54.829.7
Released2026-09-022024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3713

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3phi-3-medium 14B
CursorBench41.6%—
LMArena WebDev1657—
SciCode59.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—37.6%
LMArena Coding1514—
BigCodeBench Complete—48.7%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3phi-3-medium 14B
APEX-Agents57.8%—
GDP.pdf27.6%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3phi-3-medium 14B
Epoch Capabilities Index156.75121.23
NYT Connections (extended)85.1%—
CritPt26%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1503—
Mystery Game Puzzles25%—
DTBench96.5%—
LMCA53.9%—
Adversarial NLI—55.8%
Bench to the Future 30.14—
BIG-Bench Hard—81.4%
HellaSwag—82.4%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3phi-3-medium 14B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)74.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
ProofBench58%—
LMArena Math1494—
MATH Level 5—17.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3phi-3-medium 14B
GPQA Diamond—27.6%
LMArena Expert1516—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—91.6%
MMLU—78%
OpenBookQA—87.4%
TriviaQA—73.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3phi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Vision1309—
LMArena Document1471—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3phi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Non-English1481—
LMArena Chinese1529—
LMArena French1524—
LMArena German1515—
LMArena Japanese1474—
LMArena Korean1501—
LMArena Russian1490—
LMArena Spanish1490—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3phi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Instruction Following1477—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3phi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Longer Query1488—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3phi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Text1490—
LMArena Creative Writing1455—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1906—
LMArena Multi-Turn1482—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.3 or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.6 versus 36.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.3 and phi-3-medium 14B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.3 has 37 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper