Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 Alibaba (Qwen)

38.8

Rank #181 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 73.1 to 36.1.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 specifications
Muse Spark 1.3Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index54.838.8
Released2026-09-02—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3714

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Coding15141314
CursorBench41.6%—
LMArena WebDev1657—
SciCode59.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
APEX-Agents57.8%—
GDP.pdf27.6%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Hard Prompts15031299
NYT Connections (extended)85.1%—
CritPt26%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
Mystery Game Puzzles25%—
DTBench96.5%—
LMCA53.9%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.75—

Math Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Math14941298
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)74.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
ProofBench58%—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Expert15161289

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Vision1309—
LMArena Document1471—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Non-English14811265
LMArena Chinese15291314
LMArena German15151231
LMArena Japanese14741207
LMArena Russian14901271
LMArena French1524—
LMArena Korean1501—
LMArena Spanish1490—

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Instruction Following14771275

Long Context Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Longer Query14881292

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Text14901299
LMArena Creative Writing14551262
LMArena Multi-Turn14821299
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1906—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.6 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.3 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper