Noometry

Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #71 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 73.1 to 40.1.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.3Qwen3.5 Max Preview
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index54.845.3
Released2026-09-02—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3717

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Coding15141487
CursorBench41.6%—
LMArena WebDev1657—
SciCode59.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.5 Max Preview
APEX-Agents57.8%—
GDP.pdf27.6%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts15031483
NYT Connections (extended)85.1%—
CritPt26%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
Mystery Game Puzzles25%—
DTBench96.5%—
LMCA53.9%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.75—

Math Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Math14941474
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)74.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
ProofBench58%—

Knowledge Too close to call

Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Expert15161489

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Vision1309—
LMArena Document1471—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English14811465
LMArena Chinese15291534
LMArena French15241484
LMArena German15151487
LMArena Japanese14741495
LMArena Korean15011438
LMArena Russian14901471
LMArena Spanish14901470

Instruction Following Too close to call

Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following14771467

Long Context Too close to call

Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query14881476

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)

BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3.5 Max Preview
LMArena Text14901470
LMArena Creative Writing14551464
LMArena Multi-Turn14821478
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1906—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 45.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.6 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.3 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper