Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Qwen3 8B

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 8B costs 6.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

Qwen3 8B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.7

Rank #238 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen3 8B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 73.1 to 34.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is LMCA: 53.9% for Muse Spark 1.3 and 8.8% for Qwen3 8B.
  • Qwen3 8B is cheaper at $0.18 / $0.70 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.3.
  • Muse Spark 1.3 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
  • Qwen3 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen3 8B specifications
Muse Spark 1.3Qwen3 8B
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index54.833.7
Released2026-09-022025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M131K
Max output131K8K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$0.18
Output $ / M tokens$4.25$0.70
Results tracked3711

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21), Qwen3 8B: 34.0 (#248)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3 8B
SciCode59.7%22.6%
CursorBench41.6%—
LMArena WebDev1657—
LMArena Coding1514—

Agentic & Tool Use Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30), Qwen3 8B: 30.2 (#78)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3 8B
APEX-Agents57.8%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—42.6%
GDP.pdf27.6%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27), Qwen3 8B: 16.6 (#303)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3 8B
CritPt26%0%
Chess Puzzles38%5%
DTBench96.5%59.7%
LMCA53.9%8.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index156.75136.17
NYT Connections (extended)85.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1503—
Mystery Game Puzzles25%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—

Math Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21), Qwen3 8B: 34.9 (#191)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3 8B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%56.1%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)74.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
ProofBench58%—
LMArena Math1494—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95), Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#173)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3 8B
GPQA Diamond—56.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—4.8%
LMArena Expert1516—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22), Qwen3 8B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3 8B
LMArena Vision1309—
LMArena Document1471—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8), Qwen3 8B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3 8B
LMArena Non-English1481—
LMArena Chinese1529—
LMArena French1524—
LMArena German1515—
LMArena Japanese1474—
LMArena Korean1501—
LMArena Russian1490—
LMArena Spanish1490—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22), Qwen3 8B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3 8B
LMArena Instruction Following1477—

Long Context Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32), Qwen3 8B: 37.9 (#210)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3 8B
Fiction.LiveBench—62.1%
LMArena Longer Query1488—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9), Qwen3 8B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Qwen3 8B
LMArena Text1490—
LMArena Creative Writing1455—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1906—
LMArena Multi-Turn1482—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than Qwen3 8B?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3 8B costs 6.5× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Muse Spark 1.3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3 8B?

Qwen3 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.18 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.3 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.

Is Muse Spark 1.3 or Qwen3 8B better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.6 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.3 does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.3 and Qwen3 8B share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.3 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper