Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs QwQ Plus

Muse Spark 1.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#27); QwQ Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

QwQ Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

38.0

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 42.6 to 36.4.
  • QwQ Plus is cheaper at $0.80 / $2.40 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.3.
  • Muse Spark 1.3 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.3 and QwQ Plus specifications
Muse Spark 1.3QwQ Plus
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index54.838.0
Released2026-09-022025-03-05
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M131K
Max output131K8K
Input $ / M tokens$1.25$0.80
Output $ / M tokens$4.25$2.40
Results tracked371

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21), QwQ Plus: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3QwQ Plus
CursorBench41.6%—
LMArena WebDev1657—
SciCode59.7%—
LMArena Coding1514—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30), QwQ Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3QwQ Plus
APEX-Agents57.8%—
GDP.pdf27.6%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27), QwQ Plus: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3QwQ Plus
NYT Connections (extended)85.1%—
CritPt26%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1503—
Mystery Game Puzzles25%—
DTBench96.5%—
LMCA53.9%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.75—

Math Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21), QwQ Plus: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3QwQ Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)74.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
ProofBench58%—
LMArena Math1494—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95), QwQ Plus: 36.4

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3QwQ Plus
GPQA Diamond—65.4%
LMArena Expert1516—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22), QwQ Plus: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3QwQ Plus
LMArena Vision1309—
LMArena Document1471—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8), QwQ Plus: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3QwQ Plus
LMArena Non-English1481—
LMArena Chinese1529—
LMArena French1524—
LMArena German1515—
LMArena Japanese1474—
LMArena Korean1501—
LMArena Russian1490—
LMArena Spanish1490—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22), QwQ Plus: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3QwQ Plus
LMArena Instruction Following1477—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32), QwQ Plus: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3QwQ Plus
LMArena Longer Query1488—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9), QwQ Plus: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3QwQ Plus
LMArena Text1490—
LMArena Creative Writing1455—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1906—
LMArena Multi-Turn1482—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than QwQ Plus?

Muse Spark 1.3 has enough public results to be ranked (#27); QwQ Plus does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.3 or QwQ Plus?

QwQ Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.80 per million input tokens and $2.40 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.3 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.3 does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.3 and QwQ Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.3 has 37 scored results on Noometry and QwQ Plus has 1.

Related comparisons

Go deeper