Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Wizardlm 13b

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

31.4

Rank #274 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 73.6 to 30.5.
  • Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.3 and Wizardlm 13b specifications
Muse Spark 1.3Wizardlm 13b
ProviderMetaMicrosoft
Noometry Index54.831.4
Released2026-09-02—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3710

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Coding15141035
CursorBench41.6%—
LMArena WebDev1657—
SciCode59.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30), Wizardlm 13b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Wizardlm 13b
APEX-Agents57.8%—
GDP.pdf27.6%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts15031018
NYT Connections (extended)85.1%—
CritPt26%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
Mystery Game Puzzles25%—
DTBench96.5%—
LMCA53.9%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.75—

Math Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Math14941017
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)74.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
ProofBench58%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95), Wizardlm 13b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Expert1516—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22), Wizardlm 13b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Vision1309—
LMArena Document1471—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English14811034
LMArena Chinese15291023
LMArena French1524—
LMArena German1515—
LMArena Japanese1474—
LMArena Korean1501—
LMArena Russian1490—
LMArena Spanish1490—

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following14771048

Long Context Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Longer Query14881054

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Wizardlm 13b
LMArena Text14901077
LMArena Creative Writing14551091
LMArena Multi-Turn14821047
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1906—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than Wizardlm 13b?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.3 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.6 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.3 and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.3 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper