Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Wizardlm 70b

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 73.1 to 32.2.
  • Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.3 and Wizardlm 70b specifications
Muse Spark 1.3Wizardlm 70b
ProviderMetaMicrosoft
Noometry Index54.833.0
Released2026-09-02—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3712

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding15141081
CursorBench41.6%—
LMArena WebDev1657—
SciCode59.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30), Wizardlm 70b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Wizardlm 70b
APEX-Agents57.8%—
GDP.pdf27.6%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts15031079
NYT Connections (extended)85.1%—
CritPt26%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
Mystery Game Puzzles25%—
DTBench96.5%—
LMCA53.9%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.75—

Math Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Math14941116
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)74.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
ProofBench58%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95), Wizardlm 70b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Expert1516—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22), Wizardlm 70b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Vision1309—
LMArena Document1471—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English14811078
LMArena Chinese15291052
LMArena German15151083
LMArena Russian14901155
LMArena French1524—
LMArena Japanese1474—
LMArena Korean1501—
LMArena Spanish1490—

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following14771093

Long Context Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query14881097

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Wizardlm 70b
LMArena Text14901120
LMArena Creative Writing14551149
LMArena Multi-Turn14821108
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1906—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than Wizardlm 70b?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.3 or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.6 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.3 and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.3 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper