Model comparison

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Yi-34B

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark 1.3 Meta

54.8

Rank #27 Confirmed

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.8

Rank #329 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Muse Spark 1.3 leads 73.1 to 21.6.
  • Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark 1.3 and Yi-34B specifications
Muse Spark 1.3Yi-34B
ProviderMeta01.AI
Noometry Index54.827.8
Released2026-09-022023-11-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$4.25—
Results tracked3723

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 56.6 (#21), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Yi-34B
LMArena Coding15141112
CursorBench41.6%—
LMArena WebDev1657—
SciCode59.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 38.6 (#30), Yi-34B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Yi-34B
APEX-Agents57.8%—
GDP.pdf27.6%—

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 54.0 (#27), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Yi-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts15031104
Epoch Capabilities Index156.75117.39
NYT Connections (extended)85.1%—
CritPt26%—
Chess Puzzles38%—
Mystery Game Puzzles25%—
DTBench96.5%—
LMCA53.9%—
Bench to the Future 30.14—
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%

Math Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.1 (#21), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Yi-34B
LMArena Math14941114
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)74.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 446.3%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
ProofBench58%—
MATH Level 5—5.1%
GSM8K—76%

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 42.6 (#95), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Yi-34B
LMArena Expert15161061
GPQA Diamond—14.7%
MMLU—76.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark 1.3: 43.7 (#22), Yi-34B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Yi-34B
LMArena Vision1309—
LMArena Document1471—

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 57.4 (#8), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Yi-34B
LMArena Non-English14811079
LMArena Chinese15291176
LMArena French15241081
LMArena German15151042
LMArena Japanese1474993
LMArena Korean1501959
LMArena Russian14901050
LMArena Spanish14901070

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 77.5 (#22), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Yi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following14771091

Long Context Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 45.6 (#32), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Yi-34B
LMArena Longer Query14881094

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.3 leads

Muse Spark 1.3: 73.6 (#9), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.3Yi-34B
LMArena Text14901129
LMArena Creative Writing14551108
LMArena Multi-Turn14821113
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1906—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark 1.3 better than Yi-34B?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 54.8 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark 1.3 or Yi-34B better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 56.6 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark 1.3 and Yi-34B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark 1.3 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper