Model comparison

Muse Spark vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 36.1.
  • Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct specifications
Muse SparkOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
ProviderMetaAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index50.639.4
Released2026-04-08—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2716

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding14811347
SciCode51.5%—

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14741322
CritPt11.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index152.04—

Math Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Math14551305
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench17%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Expert14571308
GPQA Diamond89.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam40.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Vision1306—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14641275
LMArena Chinese15091304
LMArena French14971328
LMArena German14971282
LMArena Korean14591206
LMArena Russian14661268
LMArena Spanish14721336

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14421299

Long Context Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14511312

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Text14741311
LMArena Creative Writing14591264
LMArena Multi-Turn14771309

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper