Model comparison
Muse Spark vs Qwen1.5-110B
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 31.2.
- Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Muse Spark | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 50.6 | 34.2 |
| Released | 2026-04-08 | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1481 | 1184 |
| SciCode | 51.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |
Reasoning Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1474 | 1168 |
| CritPt | 11.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.04 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
Math Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1455 | 1185 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 88.9% | — |
| ProofBench | 17% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 39% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1457 | 1144 |
| GPQA Diamond | 89.8% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 40.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), Qwen1.5-110B: —
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1444 | — |
Multilingual Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1464 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1509 | 1206 |
| LMArena French | 1497 | 1151 |
| LMArena German | 1497 | 1123 |
| LMArena Korean | 1459 | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | 1466 | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | 1142 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1074 |
Instruction Following Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1442 | 1158 |
Long Context Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1451 | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads
Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | Muse Spark | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1474 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1459 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1477 | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Muse Spark better than Qwen1.5-110B?
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Muse Spark or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?
Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen1.5-110B share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.