Model comparison

Muse Spark vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)

Muse Spark has enough public results to be ranked (#41); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark Meta

50.3

Rank #41 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
  • Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) specifications
Muse SparkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index50.3—
Released2026-04-082024-09-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked276

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Muse Spark: 45.6 (#65), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
SciCode51.5%—
LMArena Coding1482—

Reasoning Not comparable

Muse Spark: 34.9 (#61), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Epoch Capabilities Index152.09112.93
CritPt11.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1475—
HellaSwag—76.8%
WinoGrande—72.9%

Math Not comparable

Muse Spark: 46.8 (#57), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench17%—
LMArena Math1455—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—
GSM8K—86.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Muse Spark: 65.7 (#12), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
GPQA Diamond89.8%—
Humanity's Last Exam40.6%—
LMArena Expert1458—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—60.9%
MMLU—68%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark: 42.7 (#23), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Vision1306—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark: 56.3 (#23), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Non-English1464—
LMArena Chinese1507—
LMArena French1497—
LMArena German1497—
LMArena Korean1457—
LMArena Russian1467—
LMArena Spanish1471—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark: 76.1 (#47), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Instruction Following1443—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark: 44.4 (#65), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Longer Query1451—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark: 66.2 (#37), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
LMArena Text1474—
LMArena Creative Writing1460—
LMArena Multi-Turn1477—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?

Muse Spark has enough public results to be ranked (#41); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper