Model comparison

Muse Spark vs Qwen3.5-Flash

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark Meta

50.3

Rank #41 Confirmed

Qwen3.5-Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

42.3

Rank #105 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen3.5-Flash in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 43.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 89.8% for Muse Spark and 82.3% for Qwen3.5-Flash.

Side by side

Muse Spark and Qwen3.5-Flash specifications
Muse SparkQwen3.5-Flash
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index50.342.3
Released2026-04-082026-02-23
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.40
Results tracked2732

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 45.6 (#65), Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.9 (#234)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Coding14821412
LMArena WebDev—1243
SciCode51.5%—
ALE-Bench—221.8

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark: —, Qwen3.5-Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5-Flash
Vending-Bench 2—462.69

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 34.9 (#61), Qwen3.5-Flash: 32.9 (#63)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts14751404
Epoch Capabilities Index152.09143.98
CritPt11.3%—
Chess Puzzles—21%
Mystery Game Puzzles—20%
DTBench—82.9%
LMCA—29.1%

Math Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 46.8 (#57), Qwen3.5-Flash: 36.3 (#117)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5-Flash
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%84.4%
LMArena Math14551407
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%6.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%0%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.2%
ProofBench17%—

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 65.7 (#12), Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#84)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5-Flash
GPQA Diamond89.8%82.3%
LMArena Expert14581408
Humanity's Last Exam40.6%—
SimpleQA Verified—20.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.5%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark: 42.7 (#23), Qwen3.5-Flash: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Vision1306—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 56.3 (#23), Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.7 (#116)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Non-English14641385
LMArena Chinese15071446
LMArena French14971412
LMArena German14971389
LMArena Korean14571344
LMArena Russian14671379
LMArena Spanish14711399
LMArena Japanese—1369

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 76.1 (#47), Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.8 (#133)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14431374

Long Context Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 44.4 (#65), Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#119)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Longer Query14511392

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 66.2 (#37), Qwen3.5-Flash: 58.2 (#117)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text14741397
LMArena Creative Writing14601343
LMArena Multi-Turn14771393

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3.5-Flash?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 42.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Muse Spark or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 45.6 versus 33.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen3.5-Flash share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper