Noometry

Model comparison

Muse Spark vs Qwen3.7 Max

Muse Spark and Qwen3.7 Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (50.6 vs 51.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #42 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 62.4 to 47.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 17% for Muse Spark and 26% for Qwen3.7 Max.

Side by side

Muse SparkQwen3.7 Max
ProviderMetaAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index50.651.5
Released2026-04-082026-05-19
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked2733

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads

Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.7 Max
SciCode51.5%48.8%
LMArena Coding14811498
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
LMArena WebDev—1515
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Muse Spark: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.7 Max
GBAEval—0.4%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.7 Max
CritPt11.3%13.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts14741483
Epoch Capabilities Index152.04153.68
SimpleBench—70.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
Chess Puzzles—19%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—92.3%
LMCA—44%

Math Qwen3.7 Max leads

Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.7 Max
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%95.6%
ProofBench17%26%
LMArena Math14551490
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.7 Max
GPQA Diamond89.8%90.9%
LMArena Expert14571488
Humanity's Last Exam40.6%—
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), Qwen3.7 Max: —

BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Vision1306—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Too close to call

Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English14641474
LMArena Chinese15091530
LMArena Russian14661484
LMArena French1497—
LMArena German1497—
LMArena Korean1459—
LMArena Spanish1472—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following14421460

Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads

Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query14511482

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

BenchmarkMuse SparkQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text14741476
LMArena Creative Writing14591449
LMArena Multi-Turn14771481
EQ-Bench 4—1110

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Muse Spark and Qwen3.7 Max score almost the same on the Noometry Index (50.6 vs 51.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Muse Spark or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 46.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and Qwen3.7 Max share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper