Model comparison

Muse Spark vs WizardLM-2 8x22B

Muse Spark has enough public results to be ranked (#46); WizardLM-2 8x22B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

WizardLM-2 8x22B Microsoft

31.4

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Muse Spark scores higher in 2 categories and WizardLM-2 8x22B in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 23.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 89.8% for Muse Spark and 43.4% for WizardLM-2 8x22B.
  • WizardLM-2 8x22B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Muse Spark and WizardLM-2 8x22B specifications
Muse SparkWizardLM-2 8x22B
ProviderMetaMicrosoft
Noometry Index50.631.4
Released2026-04-082024-04-15
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—66K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.62
Output $ / M tokens—$0.62
Results tracked272

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkWizardLM-2 8x22B
SciCode51.5%—
LMArena Coding1481—

Reasoning Not comparable

Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkWizardLM-2 8x22B
CritPt11.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1474—
Epoch Capabilities Index152.04—

Math Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66), WizardLM-2 8x22B: 28.9

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkWizardLM-2 8x22B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202588.9%—
ProofBench17%—
LMArena Math1455—
MATH Level 5—25.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)39%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)14.6%—

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13), WizardLM-2 8x22B: 23.3

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkWizardLM-2 8x22B
GPQA Diamond89.8%43.4%
Humanity's Last Exam40.6%—
LMArena Expert1457—

Multimodal Not comparable

Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Vision1306—
LMArena Document1444—

Multilingual Not comparable

Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Non-English1464—
LMArena Chinese1509—
LMArena French1497—
LMArena German1497—
LMArena Korean1459—
LMArena Russian1466—
LMArena Spanish1472—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Instruction Following1442—

Long Context Not comparable

Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Longer Query1451—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39), WizardLM-2 8x22B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMuse SparkWizardLM-2 8x22B
LMArena Text1474—
LMArena Creative Writing1459—
LMArena Multi-Turn1477—

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse Spark better than WizardLM-2 8x22B?

Muse Spark has enough public results to be ranked (#46); WizardLM-2 8x22B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Muse Spark and WizardLM-2 8x22B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Muse Spark has 27 scored results on Noometry and WizardLM-2 8x22B has 2.

Related comparisons

Go deeper