Model comparison
Nemotron 3 Super vs o1
Nemotron 3 Super and o1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.1 vs 40.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 3 Super scores higher in 2 categories and o1 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where o1 leads 27.9 to 18.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 38% for Nemotron 3 Super and 47.6% for o1.
- Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.45 per million input/output tokens, against $15 / $60 for o1.
- Nemotron 3 Super accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.
- Nemotron 3 Super has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Nemotron 3 Super | o1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | NVIDIA | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 40.1 | 40.9 |
| Released | 2026-03-11 | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 200K |
| Max output | 131K | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.08 | $15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.45 | $60 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 52 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1 leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 39.4 (#158), o1: 46.1 (#70)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 38% | 47.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1403 | 1367 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 61.7% |
| SciCode | 36% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 69.7% |
| CadEval | — | 56% |
| ALE-Bench | 213.9 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 80.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Super: —, o1: 24.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 51.1% |
Reasoning o1 leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 18.7 (#276), o1: 27.9 (#111)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1386 | 1371 |
| SimpleBench | — | 41.7% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 15.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 30.7% |
| CritPt | 3.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 15% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 91.6% |
| DTBench | — | 74.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| LMCA | — | 22.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.91 |
| LiveBench | — | 75.7% |
Math Nemotron 3 Super leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 39.6 (#101), o1: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1380 | 1388 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 14.7% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 60.4% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 80.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 94.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 9.3% |
Knowledge o1 leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#139), o1: 41.5 (#110)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1398 | 1361 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 76.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 11.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Nemotron 3 Super: —, o1: 34.2 (#93)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1168 |
| GeoBench | — | 80% |
| VPCT | — | 37% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 41.4% |
Multilingual Too close to call
Nemotron 3 Super: 48.4 (#144), o1: 48.6 (#142)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1355 | 1358 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1432 | 1394 |
| LMArena French | 1405 | 1344 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1337 |
| LMArena Russian | 1336 | 1356 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | 1345 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1396 |
Instruction Following o1 leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 71.2 (#154), o1: 74.8 (#86)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1367 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.5% |
Long Context o1 leads
Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#139), o1: 50.3 (#9)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1362 | 1378 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Nemotron 3 Super: 55.9 (#140), o1: 55.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1378 | 1366 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1317 | 1348 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1369 | 1369 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 70.2% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 65.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nemotron 3 Super better than o1?
Nemotron 3 Super and o1 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.1 vs 40.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Super or o1?
Nemotron 3 Super is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; o1 lists at $15 and $60.
Is Nemotron 3 Super or o1 better for coding?
o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 39.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nemotron 3 Super does, with 262K tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do Nemotron 3 Super and o1 share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 3 Super has 21 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.