Noometry

Model comparison

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.8

Rank #22 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 73.2 to 34.3.
  • Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Nemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.8 Max
ProviderNVIDIAAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index35.956.8
Released2024-06-142026-08-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1739

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.8 Max leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228), Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Coding12091502
DeepSWE—57.5%
LMArena WebDev—1674
FrontierSWE—17.8%
SciCode—53.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.8 Max
APEX-Agents—63.3%
τ²-bench Banking—55.1%
GDP.pdf—23.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178), Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts12021496
NYT Connections (extended)—88.3%
CritPt—20%
Chess Puzzles—40%
Mystery Game Puzzles—38%
DTBench—92%
LMCA—46.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.41

Math Qwen3.8 Max leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195), Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Math12161499
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—58%

Knowledge Qwen3.8 Max leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216), Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Expert11711507
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—47.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Vision—1314
Furniture Assembly—20%

Multilingual Qwen3.8 Max leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233), Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Non-English12061472
LMArena Chinese12141538
LMArena French11971503
LMArena German11921483
LMArena Japanese11281467
LMArena Korean11481461
LMArena Russian12191481
LMArena Spanish11951492

Instruction Following Qwen3.8 Max leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232), Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Instruction Following12031479

Long Context Qwen3.8 Max leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221), Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Longer Query12251489

Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 Max leads

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233), Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

BenchmarkNemotron 4 340b InstructQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Text12251483
LMArena Creative Writing12031479
LMArena Multi-Turn12141489

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Nemotron 4 340b Instruct or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Nemotron 4 340b Instruct and Qwen3.8 Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper