Model comparison
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs o1-mini
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and o1-mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.8 vs 33.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 21.7 to 8.9.
Side by side
| Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | o1-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 32.8 | 33.7 |
| Released | 2025-12-02 | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.2 (#130), o1-mini: 35.1 (#218)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 32.9% |
| SciCode | 42.7% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 36.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 48% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1362 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 78.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use o1-mini leads
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#127), o1-mini: 24.3 (#112)
Reasoning Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.7 (#189), o1-mini: 8.9 (#340)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 18.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 14% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 72.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1333 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 57.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.82 |
| LiveBench | — | 57.8% |
Math Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, o1-mini: 33.7 (#168)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 46.9% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 62% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1358 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 89.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, o1-mini: 34.8 (#180)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 62.4% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1316 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, o1-mini: 43.8 (#177)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1289 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena French | — | 1292 |
| LMArena German | — | 1278 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1245 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1223 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1302 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, o1-mini: 67.0 (#200)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 65.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1304 |
Long Context Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, o1-mini: 40.1 (#156)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1321 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, o1-mini: 48.6 (#196)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | o1-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1317 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1244 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 64.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1314 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 40.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than o1-mini?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and o1-mini score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.8 vs 33.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview or o1-mini better for coding?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and o1-mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.