Model comparison
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.4 vs 33.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 40.8 to 22.6.
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.4 | 33.4 |
| Released | 2025-12-02 | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 29K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.66 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 31 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 16.4% |
| SciCode | 42.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 56.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1276 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 77% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: —
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | 2% | — |
Reasoning Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 42.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1251 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 119.49 |
| HellaSwag | — | 83% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.8% |
Math Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | — | 46.6% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1251 |
| GSM8K | — | 93% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1221 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 70.5% |
| MMLU | — | 79.1% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1228 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.7% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1223 |
Long Context Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1251 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)
| Benchmark | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1222 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 23.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.4 vs 33.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.