Model comparison

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview Amazon

33.4

Rank #244 Reported

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.8

Rank #22 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 54.4 to 22.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GDP.pdf: 2% for Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and 23.2% for Qwen3.8 Max.

Side by side

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen3.8 Max specifications
Nova 2.0 Pro PreviewQwen3.8 Max
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.456.8
Released2025-12-022026-08-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked339

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.8 Max leads

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133), Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro PreviewQwen3.8 Max
SciCode42.7%53.2%
DeepSWE—57.5%
LMArena WebDev—1674
FrontierSWE—17.8%
LMArena Coding—1502

Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3.8 Max leads

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136), Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro PreviewQwen3.8 Max
GDP.pdf2%23.2%
APEX-Agents—63.3%
τ²-bench Banking—55.1%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194), Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro PreviewQwen3.8 Max
CritPt0%20%
NYT Connections (extended)—88.3%
Chess Puzzles—40%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1496
Mystery Game Puzzles—38%
DTBench—92%
LMCA—46.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.41

Math Not comparable

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro PreviewQwen3.8 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—58%
LMArena Math—1499

Knowledge Not comparable

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro PreviewQwen3.8 Max
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—47.3%
LMArena Expert—1507

Multimodal Not comparable

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro PreviewQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Vision—1314
Furniture Assembly—20%

Multilingual Not comparable

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro PreviewQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Non-English—1472
LMArena Chinese—1538
LMArena French—1503
LMArena German—1483
LMArena Japanese—1467
LMArena Korean—1461
LMArena Russian—1481
LMArena Spanish—1492

Instruction Following Not comparable

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro PreviewQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Instruction Following—1479

Long Context Not comparable

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro PreviewQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Longer Query—1489

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2.0 Pro PreviewQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Text—1483
LMArena Creative Writing—1479
LMArena Multi-Turn—1489

Frequently asked questions

Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Nova 2.0 Pro Preview or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 40.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Nova 2.0 Pro Preview and Qwen3.8 Max share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper