Model comparison

Nova 2 Lite vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct

Nova 2 Lite and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.7 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Nova 2 Lite Amazon

39.7

Rank #161 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Nova 2 Lite scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Nova 2 Lite leads 43.0 to 36.1.
  • Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Nova 2 Lite and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct specifications
Nova 2 LiteOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
ProviderAmazonAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index39.739.4
Released2025-12-01—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M—
Max output64K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked1916

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nova 2 Lite leads

Nova 2 Lite: 40.7 (#134), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Coding13851347

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Nova 2 Lite: 24.1 (#121), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%—

Reasoning Nova 2 Lite leads

Nova 2 Lite: 27.5 (#118), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13641322

Math Nova 2 Lite leads

Nova 2 Lite: 37.5 (#156), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Math13591305

Knowledge Nova 2 Lite leads

Nova 2 Lite: 43.0 (#94), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Expert13581308
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.1%—

Multilingual Nova 2 Lite leads

Nova 2 Lite: 47.1 (#153), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13371275
LMArena Chinese13641304
LMArena French13811328
LMArena German13431282
LMArena Korean12841206
LMArena Russian13431268
LMArena Spanish13731336
LMArena Japanese1271—

Instruction Following Nova 2 Lite leads

Nova 2 Lite: 70.5 (#161), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13351299

Long Context Too close to call

Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#150), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13351312

Writing & Preference Nova 2 Lite leads

Nova 2 Lite: 53.9 (#154), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteOlmo 3.1 32b Instruct
LMArena Text13621311
LMArena Creative Writing12911264
LMArena Multi-Turn13381309

Frequently asked questions

Is Nova 2 Lite better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?

Nova 2 Lite and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.7 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Nova 2 Lite or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?

Nova 2 Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Nova 2 Lite and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2 Lite has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper