Model comparison
Nova Premier 1.0 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 26.4 to 23.0.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Nova Premier 1.0 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 38.3 | 39.4 |
| Released | 2025-04-30 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 10K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $12.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 6 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Nova Premier 1.0: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1347 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 44.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1322 |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 35% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 72.6% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 51.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1308 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Nova Premier 1.0: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |
Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 80.3% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1299 |
Long Context Not comparable
Nova Premier 1.0: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1264 |
| WildBench | 78.8% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nova Premier 1.0 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Nova Premier 1.0 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova Premier 1.0 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.