Model comparison
Nova Premier 1.0 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Nova Premier 1.0 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.3 vs 37.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nova Premier 1.0 leads 51.0 to 46.2.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Nova Premier 1.0 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 38.3 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2025-04-30 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 10K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $12.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 6 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Nova Premier 1.0: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1291 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 44.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1272 |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 35% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 72.6% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 51.8% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1295 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Nova Premier 1.0: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1242 |
| LMArena French | — | 1260 |
| LMArena German | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1289 |
Instruction Following Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 80.3% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1247 |
Long Context Not comparable
Nova Premier 1.0: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Nova Premier 1.0 leads
Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)
| Benchmark | Nova Premier 1.0 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1226 |
| WildBench | 78.8% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Nova Premier 1.0 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Nova Premier 1.0 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.3 vs 37.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Nova Premier 1.0 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova Premier 1.0 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.