Model comparison

o1-mini vs o3-mini

o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 37 shared benchmarks.

o1-mini OpenAI

34.0

Rank #235 Confirmed

o3-mini OpenAI

36.7

Rank #212 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 37 benchmarks with published results for both. o1-mini scores higher in 2 categories and o3-mini in 7 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where o3-mini leads 75.1 to 66.7.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Coding: 48% for o1-mini and 82.7% for o3-mini.

Side by side

o1-mini and o3-mini specifications
o1-minio3-mini
ProviderOpenAIOpenAI
Noometry Index34.036.7
Released2024-09-122024-12-20
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.10
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked3951

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3-mini leads

o1-mini: 35.5 (#224), o3-mini: 40.8 (#132)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarko1-minio3-mini
Aider Polyglot32.9%60.4%
WeirdML36.3%43.7%
LiveBench Coding48%82.7%
LMArena Coding13621378
SciCode—39.8%
GSO—1.3%
CadEval—54%
HumanEval+89%—
MBPP+78.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use o3-mini leads

o1-mini: 24.6 (#118), o3-mini: 29.6 (#84)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarko1-minio3-mini
Cybench10%22.5%

Reasoning o3-mini leads

o1-mini: 8.8 (#346), o3-mini: 16.3 (#305)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarko1-minio3-mini
ARC-AGI-20.8%3%
SimpleBench18.1%22.8%
ARC-AGI-114%34.5%
LiveBench Reasoning72.3%89.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts13331366
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%70.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index135.82140.34
LiveBench57.8%75.9%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—17%
Mystery Game Puzzles—7%
DTBench—68.8%
LMCA—19%
ForecastBench—59.6

Math o1-mini leads

o1-mini: 35.4 (#186), o3-mini: 28.1 (#244)

Knowledge o3-mini leads

o1-mini: 34.9 (#192), o3-mini: 38.3 (#146)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarko1-minio3-mini
GPQA Diamond62.4%77%
Confabulations18.6%17.9%
LMArena Expert13161364
SimpleQA Verified—15.3%

Multilingual o3-mini leads

o1-mini: 43.6 (#182), o3-mini: 45.7 (#164)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarko1-minio3-mini
LMArena Non-English12891319
LMArena Chinese13141379
LMArena French12931334
LMArena German12781303
LMArena Japanese12451286
LMArena Korean12231314
LMArena Russian12831304
LMArena Spanish13031321

Instruction Following o3-mini leads

o1-mini: 66.7 (#206), o3-mini: 75.1 (#72)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarko1-minio3-mini
LiveBench Instruction Following65.4%84.4%
LMArena Instruction Following13041337

Long Context o1-mini leads

o1-mini: 40.1 (#161), o3-mini: 33.8 (#256)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarko1-minio3-mini
LMArena Longer Query13201343
Fiction.LiveBench—50%

Writing & Preference o3-mini leads

o1-mini: 48.4 (#202), o3-mini: 50.3 (#182)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarko1-minio3-mini
LMArena Text13171337
LMArena Creative Writing12441286
Short-Story Creative Writing64.9%61.7%
LMArena Multi-Turn13141320
LiveBench Language40.9%50.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is o1-mini better than o3-mini?

o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is o1-mini or o3-mini better for coding?

o3-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do o1-mini and o3-mini share?

37 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-mini has 39 scored results on Noometry and o3-mini has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper